Caryl v. Buchmann’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1958
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mulcairns v. City of Janesville · Smith v. Sherwood · Kersten v. Weichman · Heucke v. Milwaukee City Railway · In Re Ziegler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““What has been said as to the necessity of the judge being present at all sessions of the court applies equally to the reporter. He should be where he can be called upon at any time to take down the proceedings.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Knipfer v. Shaw
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.