State ex rel. Rodd v. Verage’s Empirical Analysis
1922
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2019 · most notably Ex parte Grossman (1925), Root v. MacDonald (1927)
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Samuel Gompers v. Buck's Stove & Range Company · Wight v. Rindshopf · In re Pierce · Emerson v. Huss · Slater v. . Merritt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““295.01 Every court of record . . . shall have power to punish by fine and imprisonment, or either, any neglect or violation of duty or any misconduct by which the rights or remedies of a party in an action or proceeding depending or triable in such court . . . may be defeated, impaired, impeded or prejudiced in the following cases : . . . “(3) Parties to actions . . . and all other persons . . . for any other disobedience to any lawful order, judgment or process of such court. ...””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.