Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 177 Wis. 2d 305 - State v. Seymour

177 Wis. 2d 305 - State v. Seymour’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 656

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Turner v. United States · Schad v. Arizona · Harris v. McRae · United States v. Gipson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) ... Whoever does any of the following may be penalized as provided in sub. (3): (b) By virtue of his office, business or employment, or as trustee or bailee, having possession or custody of money ... intentionally uses, transfers, conceals, or retains possession of such money ... without the owner's consent, contrary to his authority, and with intent to convert to his own use or to the use of any other person except the owner....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “I don't think that it would be fatal if for example [the jury was] instructed in regard to use, transfer, conceal, or retain.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “intentionally used, transferred, and retained possession”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.