177 Wis. 2d 709 - State v. Sutton’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2018
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 152 Wis. 2d 243 - State v. Wilke · 154 Wis. 2d 199 - Employers Insurance of Wausau v. Smith · 138 Wis. 2d 192 - Midwest Mutual Insurance v. Nicolazzi · 172 Wis. 2d 391 - State v. Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substantial compliance does require 'actual compliance in respect to the substance essential to every reasonable objective of the statute.' " Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d at 250 (citation omitted). In Sutton the court of appeals explained that "[t]he reasonable objective of sec. 343.305(4), Stats., is to require the officer to inform the arrestee of the possible sanctions resulting from his taking or refusing to take the test.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to obtain substantial compliance, the officer must not understate the penalties for either refusal to take the test or taking the test and obtaining an inappropriate test result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.