State v. Gale’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 1998
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 161 W. Va. 517 - State v. Starkey · 163 W. Va. 40 - State v. Burton · 165 W. Va. 588 - State v. Clawson · United States v. Sink · 170 W. Va. 428 - State v. Buck
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘There may be dispute about whether a writing exists, or whether it is a “statement” within the definition of the rule, or whether it relates to the subject matter concerning which the witness has testified. The court must resolve the dispute. It cannot simply accept the assurance of the attorney who has called the witness that he has disclosed to the other party éverything that is within the scope of the rule. If there is sufficient foundation for believing that there may be a statement that ought to be produced in whole or in part, the court is required to order that the statement be delivered to the court in camera. The court is also to decide for itself what other evidence it needs to hear bearing on the issue.’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[ajfter a witness other than the defendant has testified on direct examination, the court, on motion of a party who did not call the witness, shall order the attorney for the state or the defendant and his attorney, as the case may be, to produce for the examination and use of the moving party any statement of the witness that is in their possession that relates to the subject matter concerning which the witness has testified.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.