¶1The situation is not changed by the testimony taken on the second reference. We must adhere to our decision made on the 29th of September, 1916 (See 174 App. Div. 930), on the former report of the official referee, and an order is now entered confirming the reports of the referee, and disbarring the respondent. Present — Thomas, Stapleton, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ.
178 A.D. 932
In re King
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 15, 1917
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1917-05-15
Decided 1917-05-15