¶1— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: None of the issues raised by defendant warrants reversal. The trial court did not err in making its Sandoval ruling; the verdict was supported by sufficient evi*960dence and accorded with the weight of the evidence; defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the court’s instruction on interested witnesses unfairly singled out defendant; and the sentence was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Jefferson County Court, Clary, J.— Rape, 1st Degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
178 A.D.2d 959
People v. Lyng
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 26, 1991
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1991-12-26
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2000
1 federal appellate ·
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1991-12-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →