State v. Sheppard’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2007
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Noble · State v. Tims · State v. Shulark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he teachings of Noble and Shulark are summed up in the emphasis in both cases on whether the criminal conduct “was directed to the accomplishment of a single criminal objective,” Noble , or whether the conduct was “part of a continuous series of criminal acts,” Shulark . The factors of time, place and number of victims are to be considered in assessing this criminal conduct, but A.R.S § 13-604(H), in recognizing that separate crimes can be committed on “the same occasion,” does not make much sense if these factors alone are determinative.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Sheppard · State v. Rasul
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.