Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 Ariz. 507 - State v. Strong

State v. Strong’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Chapple · State v. Carrillo · State v. Hernandez · State v. Padilla · State v. Carrillo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The conduct proscribed by the statute in question here is an offer to sell narcotic drugs. To be convicted, a defendant must be aware or believe that he or she is making such an offer. This clearly would not include the sort of [“fraudulent, insincere, or made in jest”] conduct described by appellant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.