Gonzalez v. Satrustegui’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
100 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 102 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably Dole Food Co. v. North Carolina Foam Industries, Inc. (1997), In Re Estate of Jung (2005)
100 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn · Selby v. Savard · State v. Wagstaff · In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2 · State v. Rice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we determine de novo whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the trial court erred in its application of the law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Except as provided for holographic wills, ... every will shall be in writing signed by the testator or in the testator’s name by some other person in the testator’s presence and by his direction, and shall be signed by at least two persons each of whom witnessed either the signing or the testator’s acknowledgment of the signature or of the will.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Estate of Jung“In light of the legislative history and the comment to [Uniform Probate Code] section 2-502, we hold that the Legislature has superseded Gonzalez .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.