Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 Ark. 540 - Smith v. Union County

Smith v. Union County’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 1976
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 1976

3 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

60192819301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Krone v. Cooper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Every person of full age and sound mind shall list the real property of which he is the owner, situated in the county in which he resides. ...” (Our emphasis).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`Residence' * * * means the place of actual abode, and not an established domicile or home, to which one expects to return and occupy at some future time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.