Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 Ark. 6 - Jarrell v. Leeper

Jarrell v. Leeper’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2000

7 state decisions

30192819301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Keller v. Carr · Board of Supervisors v. Davenport · Krone v. Cooper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We may conclude from the cases that, in contemplation of the attachment laws generally, residence implies an established abode, fixed permanently for a time, for business or other purpose, although there may be an intent existing all the while, to return at some time or another to the true domicile; but so difficult is it found to provide a definition to meet all the varying phases of circumstances that the determination of this question may present that the courts say that, subject to the general rule, each case must be decided on its own state of facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The question of residence is a mixed one of law and fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.