In Re Everett’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably Dsc Ltd v. Dsc, Booher Enterprises v. Eastown Auto Co. (In Re Eastown Auto Co.) (1998)
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 105 · 11 U.S.C. § 303 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Grogan v. Garner · United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd. · United Families of America v. Kendrick · Andrijevic v. Kelleran · Coulson v. Coulson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“After the filing of a petition under this section but before the case is dismissed or relief is ordered, a creditor holding an unsecured claim that is not contingent, other than a creditor filing under subsection (b) of this section, may join in the petition with the same effect as if such joining creditor were a petitioning creditor under subsection (b) of this section.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.