¶1By stipulation of the parties in the above two causes, it is agreed that the decision in the case of Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith, ante, p. 786, [175 Pac. 13], shall govern and control the disposition of said two appeals, and the judgment and order of the trial court in said latter case having this day been affirmed, it is hereby ordered that the judgment and the orders denying motions for a new trial, given and made by the trial court in each of the above-entitled actions, be and the same are hereby affirmed.
178 Cal. 812
Cal. Midland Ry. v. Smith
Decided September 5, 1918
California Supreme Court · decided 1918-09-05
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yuba County, and orders denying motions for a new trial. Eugene P. McDaniel, Judge. The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Marysville Woolen Mills v. Smith, ante, p. 786.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1920
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1918-09-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →