Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 Conn. 189 - Kron v. Thelen

Kron v. Thelen’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

105 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp. (1998), Federal Deposit Insurance v. Peabody, N.E., Inc. (1996)

105 state decisions

62019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Hanson v. Denckla · Boddie v. Connecticut · Dohany v. Rogers · Hill v. Hawes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n holding that the statutory appeal period does not commence until the court gives notice of its decree, we do not intend to be construed as holding that a prospective appellant must receive notice of the decree; the sending of notice by the court is what the statute, as we construe it, and due process require. See Vecchio v. Sewer Authority, 176 Conn. 497 , 408 A.2d 254 (1979).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “In construing a statute, common sense must be used and courts must assume that a reasonable and rational result was intended . . . A CT Page 10847 statute should not be interpreted to thwart its purpose . . . and its interpretation must avoid a consequence which fails to attain a rational and sensible result.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Fundamental tenets of due process . . . require that all persons directly concerned in the result of an adjudication be given reasonable notice and the opportunity to present their claims or defenses.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.