State v. Goldson’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
95 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably State v. Whistnant (1980), State v. Sharpe (1985)
95 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Holland v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · State v. Evans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]f separate charges explicitly addressing different temporal aspects of the same conduct do not avoid the double jeopardy clause, surely an information and bill of particulars stipulating a single date and time cannot do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Porter“[w]e must refer to the language of the information against the defendant, as amplified by the bill of particulars.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Porter“the statutes, charging instruments, and bill of particulars as opposed to the evidence presented at trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Porter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.