178 Conn. App. 102 - State v. Myers’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

21 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “It is also a well established principle that arguments cannot be raised for the first time in a reply brief.... State v. Garvin , 242 Conn. 296 , 312, 699 A.2d 921 (1997) ; see also SS-II, LLC v. Bridge Street Associates , 293 Conn. 287 , 302, 977 A.2d 189 (2009) ; Calcano v. Calcano , 257 Conn. 230 , 244, 777 A.2d 633 (2001) ; Commissioner of Health Services v. Youth Challenge of Greater Hartford, Inc. , 219 Conn. 657 , 659 n.2, 594 A.2d 958 (1991). [I]t is improper to raise a new argument in a reply brief, because doing so deprives the opposing party of the opportunity to respond in writing.... Markley v. Dept. of Public Utility Control , 301 Conn. 56 , 74, 23 A.3d 668 (2011).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 189 Conn. App. 398 - Natasha B. v. Dept. of Children & Families