Smith v. Kingsland’s Empirical Analysis
178 F.2d 26 · 1949
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 1965
7 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co. · Miller v. Eagle Manuf'G Co · Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co. · Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co. · Electric Storage Battery Co. v. Shimadzu
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“arranged in series extending substantially around and adjacent the walls”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“were anticipated in the specification of the patent granted in 1936.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.