Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 F.2d 459 - United States v. Shapiro

United States v. Shapiro’s Empirical Analysis

178 F.2d 459 · 1949

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
states following
December 2009
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently December 2009 · most notably Swiren v. Commissioner (1950), In Re Decker (1969)

16 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

1901949195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 117 · 26 U.S.C. § 23

Relies on Commissioner v. Whitney · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Shapiro · Thornley v. Commissioners of Internal Revenue · Guinness v. United States · Humphrey v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “contrary to the overwhelming weight of authority.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the sale of a capital asset resulting in a long-term capital gain.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is now the overwhelming weight of authority and the law of this circuit that an interest in a partnership is a capital asset. 2 The interest of John Snow in the partnership (as contrasted with partnership earnings) was held for more than six months and therefore qualifies for capital gains treatment under Section 117 of the Internal Revenue Code. [Footnote 2 omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.