Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 F.2d 774 - Cutting v. Bullerdick

Cutting v. Bullerdick’s Empirical Analysis

178 F.2d 774 · 1949

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
July 1982
most recently cited

21 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 1982

21 federal appellate ·

11019491950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Taylor v. Voss · Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group · Russell v. Stansell · Brandies v. Cochrane · Crump v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “desire to post a supersedeas bond and perfect an appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.