Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 F.2d 781 - Dunlap v. Oldham Lumber Co.

Dunlap v. Oldham Lumber Co.’s Empirical Analysis

178 F.2d 781 · 1950

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
August 1981
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently August 1981 · most notably Galena Oaks Corporation v. Frank Scofield, Collector of Internal Revenue (1954), Rollingwood Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Bohannon v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1951)

47 federal appellate · 1 district ·

7501950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 117

Relies on Snell v. Commissioner · Fahs v. Crawford · Richards v. Commissioner · Ehrman v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““§ 117. Capital gains and losses “(a) Definitions. As used in this chapter— “(1) Capital assets. The term ‘capital assets’ means property held by the taxpayer (whether or not connected with his trade or business), but does not include— “(A) stock in trade of the taxpayer or other property of a kind which would properly be included in the inventory of the taxpayer if on hand at the close of the taxable year, or property held by the taxpayer primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of this trade or business; * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “ordinary course of the business of the taxpayer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.