Kooritzky v. Herman’s Empirical Analysis
178 F.3d 1315 · 1999
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Baker & Hostetler LLP v. United States Department of Commerce (2006), In re Sealed Case No. 97-3112 (1999)
11 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey · Kay v. Ehrler · Independent Federation of Flight Attendants v. Zipes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the reasonable expenses of expert witnesses, the reasonable cost of any study, analysis, engineering report, test, or project which is found by the court to be necessary for the preparation of the party's case, and reasonable attorney fees.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it would seem a strange incentive to provide witness fees not for the purpose of reimbursing a litigant for his out-of-pocket costs, but as salary for time spent as a witness in his own litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“and expert witness expenses are separate and distinct items of expense. See Kooritzky v. Herman, 178 F.3d 1315, 1322 (D.C.Cir.1999) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.