No. 98-1604’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Tarr v. Ciasulli (2004), Applegate v. United States (2002)
1 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Blum v. Stenson · Carey v. Piphus · Monge v. California · Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[a]n award of damages for emotional distress must be supported by competent evidence of”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Forshee suffered no physical injury, she was not medically treated for any psychological or emotional injury, and no other witnesses corroborated any outward manifestation of emotional distress. After the termination, rather than returning to an employment agency, Forshee found a new job on her own almost immediately and while her income declined, there was no testimony explaining why the award of damages for lost wages is not sufficient to make her whole.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.