United States v. Barrett’s Empirical Analysis
178 F.3d 643 · 1999
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably United States v. Rigas (2007), United States v. Morris (2003)
24 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Maher · United States v. Stavroulakis · United States v. Hill · Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Citibank, N. A. · United States v. Echevarria
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) engaged in a course of conduct designed to deceive a federally chartered or insured financial institution into releasing property; and (2) possessed an intent to victimize the institution by exposing it to actual or potential loss.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“banks face practical adverse consequences and potential liability problems when they cash checks over forged endorsements”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“extent to which the [defendant's] position provides the freedom to commit a difficult-to-detect wrong.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.