Taylor v. Slick’s Empirical Analysis
178 F.3d 698 · 1999
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably In Re Townsville (2001), Hart v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Hart) (2000)
1 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Goldberg v. Kelly · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. Sullivan · Chemetron Corp. v. Jones
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he filing of a bankruptcy petition prohibits the beginning (“commencement”) of a judicial proceeding and the carrying forward (“continuation”) of a proceeding that has already begun. The “continuation” of a sheriffs sale on the other hand, connotes the postponement of a proceeding, and effectuates the purposes of § 362(a)(1) by preserving the status quo until the bankruptcy process is completed or until the creditor obtains relief from the automatic stay.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) Except as provided by subdivision (b) or special order of court, new notice shall be given as provided by Rule 3129.2 if a sale of real property is stayed, continued, postponed or adjourned. (b) If the sale is stayed, continued, postponed or adjourned to a date certain within one hundred days of the scheduled sale, and public announcement thereof, including the new date, is made to the bidders assembled at the time and place originally fixed for the sale, no new notice shall be required, but there may be only one such stay, continuance, postponement or adjournment without new notice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The primary purposes of the automatic stay provisions are to effectively stop all creditor collection efforts, stop all harassment of a debtor seeking relief, and to maintain the status quo between the debtor and [his] creditors, thereby affording the parties and the Court an opportunity to appropriately resolve competing economic interests in an orderly and effective way.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Traversa · In re Horton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.