United States v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
178 F.3d 904 · 1999
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably United States v. Stewart (2009), United States v. Robbins (1999)
15 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments) · 18 U.S.C. § 2113
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · United States v. Andrus · United States v. Singleton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he defendant is not entitled to have his request granted absent some indication that the [discovery] contains impeachment material of the kind requested.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Whoever ... (2) directly or indirectly, gives, offers or promises anything of value to any person, for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon a trial ... before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or for or because of such person's absence therefrom ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.