Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 F.3d 927 - United States v. Gambrell

United States v. Gambrell’s Empirical Analysis

178 F.3d 927 · 1999

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably Leaf v. Shelnutt (2005), United States v. Brown (1999)

18 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

210199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Krull · Wilson v. Arkansas · Richards v. Wisconsin · Arizona v. Evans · Laws v. United Missouri Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a reasonable suspicion that an announced entry would have subjected the officers to a substantial risk of harm”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 920 , 120 S.Ct. 281 , 145 L.Ed.2d 236 (1999); United States v. Buckley, 4 F.3d 552 , 558 (7th Cir.1993) (determining that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “federal standards control the admissibility of evidence in a federal prosecution even though the evidence was seized by state officials andwould not be admissible in state court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “answered the door wearing a .25 caliber gun in her front pocket.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.