Jones v. Stansberry

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided May 3, 2006

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2006-05-03

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Decided 2006-05-03

¶1 Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*279 PER CURIAM:

¶3 William James Jones, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) because the motion should have been brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. Stansberry, No. CA-05-342-5-H (E.D.N.C. July 12, 2005). We deny Jones’ motion to file a formal brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4 AFFIRMED