178 F. Supp. 138 - Mitchell v. Tune’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 217
Relies on Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co. · Alstate Const Co v. Durkin · 10 East 40th Street Building, Inc. v. Callus · Chambers Construction Company, a Corporation, and L. H. Chambers v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor · Walling v. McCrady Const. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In determining cases in this field there are certain general pronouncements of the Supreme Court of the United States to serve as guide posts. It should first of all be recognized that the Fair Labor Standards Act must be given a liberal construction. Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co. [ 349 U.S. 427 , 75 S.Ct. 860 , 99 L.Ed. 1196 ] supra. The second guiding factor is that the scope of the Act is not co-extensive with the power of Congress over commerce. 10 East 40th Street Building, Inc. v. Callus, 325 U.S. 578 , 65 S.Ct. 1227 , 89 L.Ed. 1806 . The Supreme Court has further said that the determination of whether an employee is covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act should be made by practical considerations and not technical conceptions. Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co., supra.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.