178 F. Supp. 2d 186 - Aeid v. Bennett’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · North Carolina v. Alford · Hill v. Lockhart · United States v. Cronic · Moran v. Burbine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must demonstrate a reasonable probability that but for Counsel's errors in considering or explaining a plea offer, he would have accepted the prosecution's offer [of a 5-to-15-year sentence of imprisonment].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Aeid v. Bennett“demonstrated prejudice in that he would have accepted the plea offer of five to fifteen years but for the erroneous advice of Counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Aeid v. Bennett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.