178 F. Supp. 3d 69 - Cabrera v. Schafer’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956)
Relies on Kramer v. Time Warner Inc. · International Star Class Yacht Racing Association v. Tommy Hilfiger Usa Inc · 706 F. Supp. 2d 521 - Svensson v. Securian Life Insurance · Rosas v. Alice's Tea Cup, LLC · 607 F. Supp. 2d 366 - Pelosi v. Spota
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]ecause the effect of judicial notice is to deprive a part of the opportunity to use rebuttal evidence, cross-examination, and argument to attack contrary evidence, caution must be used in determining that a fact is beyond controversy under Rule 201(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that is not subject to reasonable dispute because it: (1) is generally known within the trial court's territorial jurisdiction; or (2) can be accurately and readily determined from sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In a civil case, once the court takes judicial notice of adjudicative facts ..., 'there is to be no evidence before the jury in disproof,' and '[t]he judge instructs the jury to take judicially noticed facts as established.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.