Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 Ga. App. 378 - Jackson v. State

178 Ga. App. 378 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2012

7 state decisions

401986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Gibbons v. State · Gardiner v. State · 86 Ga. App. 779 - Potts v. State · 155 Ga. App. 798 - Black v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘ “The conduct of a defendant before, during the time of, and after the commission of a crime may be considered by the jury in establishing his intention and his participation, to determine whether or not such intention and conduct were sufficient corroboration of the testimony of an accomplice to sustain a conviction. This may be done by circumstantial as well as by direct evidence.” ’ [Cit.]” Jackson v. State, 178 Ga. App. 378 ( 343 SE2d 122 ) (1986). Such corroborating conduct includes the defendant’s commission of similar transactions which “ ‘were clearly interwoven and linked (connected) with the facts of the crime charged. . . .’” (Emphasis in original.) Perryman v. State, 63 Ga. App. 825, 827 ( 12 SE2d 392 ) (1940). See also Jackson v. State, supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.