178 Ind. App. 101 - Shaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2004
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Bridenhager · State Ex Rel. Hodshire v. Bingham, Judge · 137 Ind. App. 510 - Trinity Universal Insurance v. Town of Speedway · Sherwood v. State · 159 Ind. App. 449 - Gillespie v. Gilmore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The trial judge plays an integral role in the orderly administration of justice. He must be above reproach. The purpose and objective of the rules for the selection of a special judge are to secure not only a person who is fair and impartial, but also one in whom the parties have confidence. Insofar as the rules of procedure permit, this confidence requires that no-one should be required to try his case before a judge that he feels or believes is unfair or prejudiced.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. Lake County
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.