Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 Ind. App. 124 - Hitlaw v. State

178 Ind. App. 124 - Hitlaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2012

17 state decisions

8019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Stowers v. State · Harshman v. State · Boles v. State · Tyler v. Campbell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was required to establish a factual basis for a guilty plea to the crime proscribed by I.C. 9-4-18-14. We decline to follow the rule created by this decision. Indiana Code 35-85-1-8(b) provides that the court shall not enter judgment upon a plea of guilty”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “unless it is satisfied from its examination of the defendant or the evidence presented that there is a factual basis for the plea.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.