Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 Kan. 104 - Bailey v. Norton

Bailey v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
3
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2015

4 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

801955196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hill v. Maxwell · Alexander v. Flick · Todd v. Allen · Quinlan, Montgomery & Co. v. Danford · Cretcher v. Fisher Machine Works Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the terms of a written contract may be varied, modified, waived, annulled, or wholly set aside by any subsequently executed contract, whether such subsequently executed contract be in writing or in parol.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.