Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 La. 479 - State v. Heymann

State v. Heymann’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
4
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Roberts v. City of Baton Rouge (1958), State Ex Rel. Porterie v. H. L. Hunt, Inc. (1935)

25 state decisions

70193319401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Flint v. Stone Tracy Co. · Knowlton v. Moore · Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. · Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. · Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any person, firm, corporation or association of persons operating any office building and deriving revenue therefrom, whether same is operated in connection with any other business or not, shall pay a license tax equal to one-tenth (1/10) of one per cent of the gross rent or compensation therefrom; provided, however, that any person, firm, corporation or association of persons owning and occupying any portion of the said office building in the carrying on of its own business that only that part of the rent or compensation received from other persons, firms, corporations or association of persons shall be deemed as rent or compensation under this Act. Provided, further, that where the said building is owned by a subsidiary corporation, all of the capital stock of which, except directors qualifying shares, if any, are owned by said corporation, shall be considered the same as if the building were owned by the parent corporation and the area used by them for which rent is paid shall not be considered as rent under this section.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.