Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 MICH 555 - McKinley v. Small

McKinley v. Small’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1922
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bonesteel v. Todd · Lyon v. Lindblad · J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Huber · Westinghouse Co. v. Gainor · J. A. Fay & Co. v. James Jenks & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We guarantee the above named horse to be a reasonably sure foal-getter and transmitter of sixty per cent, of good producing mares owned by the above-named stockholders, provided he shall have plenty of exercise and proper feeding and grooming, care and handling, and in case he should not prove so, we agree to replace him with another of .the same breed and price, upon the delivery to us of the above named horse in as sound and good condition as he is at present.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.