Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 N.C. 748 - State v. . Mull

State v. . Mull’s Empirical Analysis

1919

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2018

3 state decisions

1019191920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “simply as a reenactment, except as to the new provision, which is to take effect from the time of the amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.