Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 N.C. App. 134 - State v. Smith

178 N.C. App. 134 - State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Keeble v. United States · Alaska v. Babbitt · State v. Cooke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “impermissibly presents a different theory on appeal than argued at trial, th[e] assignment of error was not properly preserved for appellate review”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]nterrogation' [is] `[a] practice that the police should know is reasonably likely to evoke an incriminating response from a suspect.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.