Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 Neb. 596 - State v. Ohler

State v. Ohler’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
May 1993
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 1993 · most notably 151 W. Va. 796 - State v. Bailey (1967), State v. Sheldon (1965)

30 state decisions

1401965197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reyes v. State · Morgan v. State · Jeppesen v. State · Hiner v. State · Kitts v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the province of the jury to determine the circumstances surrounding, and which shed light upon, the alleged crime; and if, assuming as proved the facts which the evidence tends to establish, they can be accounted for upon no rational theory which does not include the guilt of the accused, the proof cannot, as a matter of law, be said to have failed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To justify a conviction on circumstantial evidence it is necessary that the facts and circumstances essential to the conclusion sought must be proved by competent evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, and when taken together must be of such a character as to be consistent with each other and with the hypothesis sought to be established thereby, and inconsistent with any reasonable hypothesis of innocence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.