State v. Milne’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Indelicato v. United States · Bullock v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. · State v. Preciose · State v. Afanador · State v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Absent compelling, extenuating circumstances, the burden to justify filing a petition after the five-year period will increase with the extent of the delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“an 'injustice' sufficient to relax the time limits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`analogue to the federal writ of habeas corpus.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Echols
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.