Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 NW2D 329 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2015

10 state decisions

7019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Bumper v. North Carolina · Stoner v. California · United States v. Jeffers · Chapman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A warrantless search of a tenant’s room, although consented to by a landlord who had been given some authority by the tenant to enter the room, is illegal and violative of tenant’s Fourth Amendment constitutional rights * * * “We recognize in a situation where police officers are lawfully admitted to private premises they can seize what is in plain view, and not be subject to the charge that such actions were searches without warrant. This presupposes of course the entry or admittance is lawful, * * * This rule applies only on the condition the officers are lawftilly admitted to the private premises and focuses the issue in this case.” (Emphasis in original.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.