Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 NW2D 434 - State v. Nelson

State v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
5
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably State v. Serpente (1989), State v. Kueny (1974)

2 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

16019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dennis v. United States · Winters v. People of State of New York · Smith v. People of the State of California · United States v. Wiltberger · State v. Wallace

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[s]tatutes defining crimes are to be strictly construed and not to be held to include charges plainly without the fair scope and intendment of the language of the statute, though within its reason and policy, and in the event of doubts they are to be resolved in favor of the accused.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““If any man and woman not being married to each other, lewdly and viciously associate and cohabit together, or if any man or woman, married or unmarried, is guilty of open and gross lewdness, and designedly makes an open and indecent or obscene exposure of his or her person, or of the person of another, every such person shall be imprisoned in the county jail not exceeding six months, or be fined not exceeding two hundred dollars.” (Emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It is the legislature, not the court, which is to define crime and ordain its punish-ment_ It would be dangerous, indeed, to carry the principle that a case which is within the reason or mischief of a statute is within its provision so far as to punish a crime not enumerated in the statute because it is of equal atrocity or of kindred character with those which are enumerated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.