State v. Porter’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

59 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[t]he Miranda presumption applies to the conditions inherent in custodial interrogation that compel the suspect to confess. It does not extend to any actual coercion police might engage in, and the Due Process Clause continues to require an inquiry separate from custody considerations and compliance with Miranda regarding whether a suspect's will was overborne by the circumstances surrounding his confession.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Hall · State v. White

2. “the State failed to show that the police 'were actively pursuing an alternate line of investigation, one untainted by the illegality that took place prior to the particular misconduct,'”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Ewing · State v. Maffey

3. “State v. Porter, 178 Ohio App.3d 304 , 2008-Ohio-1149, ¶ 43 (2d Dist.). Otherwise, the inevitable-discovery doctrine would apply even if police merely”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Maffey