178 Ohio App. 3d 574 - State v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
92
cited by 92 later decisions
1
states following
March 2024
most recently cited
92 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 148 Ohio St. 505 - State v. Petro · 19 Ohio App. 3d 141 - State v. Walden · 141 Ohio App. 3d 578 - State v. Roberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 92 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[A] party is unavoidably prevented from filing a motion for new trial if the party had no knowledge of the existence of the ground supporting the motion for new trial and could not have learned of the existence of that ground within the time prescribed for filing the motion for new trial in the exercise of reasonable diligence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. DeVaughns“To obtain leave, defendant must demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he or she was unavoidably prevented from timely filing the motion for a new trial or discovering the new evidence within the time period provided by Crim.R. 33(B).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. DeVaughns
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.