178 Ohio App. 3d 713 - State v. Cihonski’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
September 2020
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Arizona v. Fulminante · State v. Bradley · Dusky v. United States · Sullivan v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] person is 'not guilty by reason of insanity' relative to a charge of an offense only if the person proves, in the manner 2 The trial court did not ask the question of defendant. No. 12AP-1091 10 specified in section 2901.05 of the Revised Code, that at the time of the commission of the offense, the person did not know, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, the wrongfulness of the person's acts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jones
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.