Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 Okla. 334 - Shaw v. Davis

Shaw v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1953
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Federal Life Ins. Co. v. Firestone · Farmers' Bank & T. Co. v. Sheffler · Kansas, Okla. & Gulf Ry. Co. v. Martin · American Surety Co. of N. Y. v. Wilson · In Re Cline's Estate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While the error, if any, may be preserved and reviewed in the manner above outlined, nevertheless an appeal may not be prosecuted directly from the order thus made. As we have said in the case of Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World, v. State ex rel. Read, 171 Okl. 387 , 42 P.2d 896 : ‘An order overruling motion to quash service of summons is not such an order as may be brought to this court for review prior to final disposition of the cause.’ See, also, Martin v. Farmer, 159 Okl. 210 , 15 P.2d 11 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.