Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 Okla. 395 - Mantooth v. Colbert

Mantooth v. Colbert’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 1994
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on City of Norman v. Allen · Davis v. Board of Commr. of Lincoln County · Arnold v. City of Tulsa

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * That T. H. White was a proper party to intervene was properly determined. The very nature of the action makes the intervener a proper party. The right is statutory. See sections 157, 158, O.S.1931; also, section 162, O.S.1931. But even if it were not statutory, the cause being by its nature equitable, the court should permit the bondholders to intervene. We therefore hold that the intervener, T. PI. White, was a proper party to this proceeding.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.