Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 Okla. 464 - Adamson v. Allende

Adamson v. Allende’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
May 1977
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1977

6 state decisions

2019361940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Baker · Palacine Oil Co. v. Philpot · Folsom Morris Coal Mining Co. v. Scott · Rock Island Coal Mining Co. v. Davis · Adamson v. Allende

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Under the law of this state, the failure of the trial court to limit the consideration of the evidence to a particular purpose when it is properly cognizable for only one purpose does not constitute reversible error, unless an instruction restricting the consideration of the evidence is requested by the complaining party and rejected by the trial court. * * * ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Where evidence incompetent in chief is erroneously admitted, but later the same evidence becomes competent for the purpose of contradicting the witness, and is properly admitted for that purpose, it would have been the duty of the court, upon request so to do, to have limited the effect of the evidence within its proper scope; but if no such request is made, nor is the court’s attention called to this phase of the matter, it will be considered as waived.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.