Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 178 Okla. 508 - Anderson v. Barr

Anderson v. Barr’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

2 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably State Ex Rel. Commissioners of Land Office v. Keller (1953), North v. Haning (1950)

2 district · 17 state decisions

60193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sichler v. Look · Wyoming Building & Loan Ass'n v. Mills Const. Co. · Sawyer v. Bahnsen · Hoyt v. Union National Bank of Wichita · Foster v. Marshall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * in Oklahoma, as in common law, it is the sale and the deed' and these alone that convey the property right, interest, or title of the mortgagee and mortgagor. It is the sale and deed and not the decree that gives to the mortgagee the fruits of his lien. It is the lien that gives to the mortgagee the right to have the specific property sold and the proceeds applied. The decree neither adds nor subtracts from the right; it only aids in the enforcement of it. “Until the sale and deed nothing has changed; the mortgagor remains the owner of the equity of redemption of fee title, and is entitled to the benefits of the land and the mortgagee is still only a lienor.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A mortgage lien on real estate is not merged into a decree of foreclosure, nor is it extinguished by the mere rendition of a decree of foreclosure. “A mere decree of foreclosure is not such a judgment as would become dormant unless execution was issued as required by 12 O. S. 1941 §735.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.